| 
       
  
      
 
      
        
      HOME
      ARCHIVES
 
  
      Emails and articles of interest are posted here by John Ray to make them more widely available
 
  
 
 
  
"And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed" -- Genesis 12:3
 
  
My (Gentile) opinion of antisemitism:  The Jews are the best we've got so killing them is killing us.
 
  
I have always liked the story of Gideon (See Judges chapters 6 to 8) and it is surely no surprise that in the present age Israel is the Gideon of nations:  Few in numbers but big in power and impact.
 
  
Postings from Brisbane, Australia by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.) -- former member of the Australia-Soviet Friendship Society, former anarcho-capitalist and former member of the British Conservative party.
 
  
America is no longer the land of the free.  It is now the land of the regulated  -- though it is not alone in that, of course
 
  
The Leftist motto: "I love humanity. It's just people I can't stand"
 
  
Why are Leftists always talking about hate?  Because it fills their own hearts
 
  
Envy is a strong and widespread human emotion so there has alway been widespread support for policies of economic "levelling".  Both the USA and the modern-day State of Israel were founded by communists but reality taught both societies that respect for the individual gave much better outcomes than levelling ideas.  Sadly, there are many people in both societies in whom hatred for others is so strong that they are incapable of respect for the individual. The destructiveness of what they support causes them to call themselves many names in different times and places but they are the backbone of the political Left
 
  
The large number of rich Leftists suggests  that, for them,  envy is secondary.  They are directly driven by hatred and scorn for many of the other people that they see about them.  Hatred of others can be rooted in many things, not only in envy.  But the haters come together as the Left.
 
  
Leftists hate the world around them and want to change it: the people in it most particularly. Conservatives just want to be left alone to make their own decisions and follow their own values. 
 
  
Ronald Reagan famously observed that the status quo is Latin for “the mess we’re in.”  So much for the vacant Leftist claim that conservatives are simply defenders of the status quo.  They think that conservatives are as lacking in  principles as they are.
 
  
The shallow thinkers of the Left sometimes claim that conservatives want to impose their own will on others in the matter of abortion.  To make that claim is however to confuse religion with politics. Conservatives are in fact divided about their response to abortion.   The REAL opposition to abortion is religious rather than political.  And the church which has historically tended to support the LEFT -- the Roman Catholic church  -- is the most fervent in the anti-abortion cause.   Conservatives   are indeed the one side of politics to have moral qualms on the issue but they tend to seek a middle road in dealing with it.  Taking the issue to the point of legal prohibitions is a religious doctrine rather than a conservative one  -- and the religion concerned  may or may not  be characteristically conservative.  More on that here
 
  
Some Leftist hatred arises from the fact that they  blame "society" for their own personal problems and inadequacies
 
  
The Leftist hunger for change to the society that they hate leads to a  hunger for control over other people.  And they will do and say anything to get that control: "Power at any price". Leftist politicians are mostly self-aggrandizing crooks who gain power by deceiving the uninformed with snake-oil promises   -- power which they invariably use to destroy.  Destruction is all that they are good at.  Destruction is what haters do.
 
  
Leftists are consistent only in their hate.  They don't have principles.  How can they when "there is no such thing as right and wrong"?  All they have is postures, pretend-principles that can be changed as easily as one changes one's shirt
 
  
I often wonder why Leftists refer to conservatives as "wingnuts".  A wingnut is a very useful device that adds versatility wherever it is used.  Clearly, Leftists are not even good at abuse.  Once they have accused their opponents of racism and Nazism, their cupboard is bare.  Similarly, Leftists seem to think it is a devastating critique to refer to "Worldnet Daily" as "Worldnut Daily".  The poverty of their argumentation is truly pitiful
 
  
The Leftist assertion that there is no such thing as right and wrong has a distinguished history.  It was Pontius Pilate who said "What is truth?" (John 18:38).  From a Christian viewpoint, the assertion is undoubtedly the Devil's gospel
 
  
"If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action." - Ludwig von Mises
 
  
The naive scholar who searches for a consistent Leftist program will not find it. What there is consists only in the negation of the present.
 
  
Because of their need to be different from the mainstream, Leftists are very good at pretending that sow's ears are silk purses
 
  
Among well-informed people, Leftism is a character defect.  Leftists hate success in others -- which is why notably successful societies such as the USA and Israel are hated and failures such as the Palestinians can do no wrong.
 
  
A Leftist's beliefs are all designed to pander to his ego.  So when you have an argument with a Leftist, you are not really  discussing the facts.  You are threatening his self esteem.  Which is why the normal Leftist response to challenge is mere abuse.
 
  
Because of the fragility of a Leftist's ego, anything that threatens it is intolerable and provokes rage.  So most Leftist blogs can be summarized in one sentence:  "How DARE anybody question what I believe!".  Rage and abuse substitute for an appeal to facts and reason.
 
  
Their threatened egos sometimes drive Leftists into quite desperate flights from reality.  For instance, they often call Israel an "Apartheid state"  -- when it is in fact the Arab states that practice Apartheid  -- witness the severe restrictions on Christians in Saudi Arabia.  There are no such restrictions  in Israel.
 
  
Because their beliefs serve their ego rather than reality, Leftists just KNOW what is good for us.  Conservatives need evidence.
 
  
“Absolute certainty is the privilege of uneducated men and fanatics.”  -- C.J. Keyser
 
  
"Almost all professors of the arts and sciences are egregiously conceited, and derive their happiness from their conceit"  -- Erasmus
 
  
THE FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY HAS DONE MORE TO IMPEDE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT THAN ANY ONE THING KNOWN TO MANKIND -- ROUSSEAU
 
  
"Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him" (Proverbs 26: 12).  I think that sums up Leftists pretty well.
 
  
Eminent British astrophysicist Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington is often quoted as saying: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine."  It was probably in fact said by his contemporary, J.B.S. Haldane.  But regardless of authorship, it could well be a conservative credo not only about the cosmos but also about human beings and human society.  Mankind is  too complex to  be summed  up by simple rules and even complex rules are only approximations with many exceptions.
 
  
Politics is the only thing Leftists know about.  They know nothing of economics, history or business.  Their only expertise is in promoting feelings of grievance
 
  
Socialism makes the individual the slave of the state – capitalism frees them.
 
  
MESSAGE to Leftists:  Even if you killed all conservatives tomorrow, you would just end up in another Soviet Union.  Conservatives are all that stand between you and that dismal fate.
 
  
Many readers here will have noticed that what I say about Leftists sometimes sounds reminiscent of  what Leftists say about conservatives.  There is an excellent reason for that.  Leftists are great "projectors" (people who see their own faults in others).  So a good first step in finding out what is true of Leftists is to look at what they say about conservatives!  They even accuse conservatives of projection (of course).
 
  
The research shows clearly that one's Left/Right stance is strongly genetically inherited but nobody knows just what specifically is inherited.    What is inherited that makes people Leftist or Rightist?  There is any amount of evidence that personality traits are strongly genetically inherited so my proposal is that hard-core Leftists are people who tend to let their emotions (including hatred and envy) run away with them and who are much more in need of seeing themselves as better than others  -- two attributes that are probably related to one another.  Such Leftists may be an evolutionary leftover from a more primitive past. 
 
  
Leftists seem to believe that if someone like Al Gore says it, it must be right.  They obviously have a strong need for an authority figure. The fact that the two most authoritarian regimes of the 20th century (Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia) were socialist is thus no surprise.  Leftists often accuse conservatives of being "authoritarian" but that is just part of their usual "projective" strategy  -- seeing in others what is really true of themselves.
 
  
Following the Sotomayor precedent, I would hope that a wise older white man such as myself  with the richness of that  experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than someone who hasn’t lived that life.
 
  
IQ and ideology:  Most academics are Left-leaning.  Why?  Because very bright people who have balls go into business, while very bright people with no balls go into academe.  I did both with considerable success, which makes me a considerable rarity.  Although I am a born academic, I have always been good with money too.  My share portfolio even survived the GFC in good shape.  The academics hate it that bright people with balls make more money than them.
 
  
If I were not an atheist, I would believe that God had a sense of humour.  He gave his chosen people (the Jews) enormous advantages  -- high intelligence and high drive  -- but to keep it fair he deprived them of something hugely important too:  Political sense.  So Jews to this day tend very strongly to be Leftist  -- even though the chief source of antisemitism for roughly the last 200 years has been the political Left!
 
  And the other side of the coin is that Jews tend to despise conservatives and Christians.  Yet American fundamentalist Christians are the bedrock of the vital American support for Israel, the ultimate bolthole for all Jews.  So Jewish political irrationality   seems to be a rather good example of the saying that "The LORD giveth and the LORD taketh away".   There are many other examples of such  perversity (or "balance").  The sometimes severe side-effects of most pharmaceutical drugs is an obvious one but there is another ethnic example too,  a rather  amusing one.  Chinese people are in general smart and patient people but their rate of traffic accidents in China is about 10 times higher than what prevails in Western societies.  They are brilliant mathematicians and fearless business entrepreneurs but at the same time bad drivers!  
  
The above is good testimony to the accuracy  of the basic conservative insight  that almost anything in human life is too complex to be reduced to any simple rule and too complex to be reduced to any rule at all without allowance for important exceptions to the rule concerned
 
  
 "Why should the German be interested in the liberation of the Jew, if the Jew is not interested in the liberation of the German?...   We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time...  In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism....  Indeed, in North America, the practical domination of Judaism over the Christian world has achieved as its unambiguous and normal expression that the preaching of the Gospel itself and the Christian ministry have become articles of trade...  Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist".  Who said that?  Hitler?  No.  It was Karl Marx.  See also here and here and here.  For roughly two centuries now, antisemitism has, throughout the Western world, been principally associated with Leftism (including the socialist Hitler)  -- as it is to this day.  See here.
 
  
Leftists call their hatred of Israel "Anti-Zionism" but Zionists are only a small minority in Israel
 
  
Some of the Leftist hatred of Israel is motivated by old-fashioned antisemitism (beliefs in Jewish "control" etc.) but most of it is just the regular  Leftist hatred of success in others.  And because  the societies they inhabit do not give them the vast amount of recognition that  their large but weak egos need, some of the most virulent haters of Israel and America live in those countries.  So the hatred is the product of pathologically high self-esteem.
 
  
Conservatives, on the other hand could be antisemitic on entirely rational grounds:  Namely, the overwhelming Leftism of the Jewish population as a whole.  Because they judge the individual, however, only a tiny minority of conservative-oriented people make such general judgments.  The longer Jews continue on their "stiff-necked" course, however, the more that is in danger of changing.  The children of Israel have been a stiff necked people since the days of Moses, however,  so they will no doubt continue to vote with their emotions rather than their reason.
 
  
Who said this  in 1968? "I am not, and never have been, a man of the right. My position was on the Left and is now in the centre of politics".  It was Sir Oswald Mosley, founder and leader of the British Union of Fascists 
 
  
The term "Fascism" is mostly used by the Left as a brainless term of abuse.  But when they do make a serious attempt to define it, they produce very complex and elaborate definitions  -- e.g.  here and here.  In fact, Fascism is simply extreme socialism plus nationalism.  But great gyrations are needed to avoid mentioning the first part of that recipe, of course.
 
  
Politicians are in general only a little above average  in intelligence so the  idea that they can  make better decisions for us that we can make ourselves is laughable
 
  
A quote from the late Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931–2005:  "You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.  When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."
 
  
The Supreme Court of the United States is now and always has been a judicial abomination.  Its guiding  principles have always been political rather than judicial.  It is not as political as Stalin's courts but its respect for the constitution is little better.   Some recent abuses:   The "equal treatment" provision of the 14th amendment was specifically written to outlaw racial discrimination yet the court has allowed various forms of "affirmative action" for decades  -- when all such policies should have been completely stuck down immediately.  The 2nd. amendment says that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed yet gun control laws infringe it in every State in the union.  The 1st amendment provides that speech shall be freely exercised yet the court has upheld various restrictions on the financing and display of political advertising.  The court has found a right to abortion in the constitution when the word abortion is not even mentioned there.  The court invents rights that do not exist and denies rights that do.
 
  
"Some action that is unconstitutional has much to recommend it"  -- Elena Kagan, nominated to SCOTUS by Obama
 
  
The U.S. Constitution is neither "living" nor dead.  It is fixed until it is amended.  But amending it is the privilege of the people, not of politicians or judges
 
  
The book, The authoritarian personality, authored by T.W. Adorno et al. in 1950, has been massively popular among psychologists.  It claims that a set of ideas that were popular in the "Progressive"-dominated America of the prewar era were "authoritarian".  Leftist regimes always are authoritarian so that claim was not a big problem.  What was quite amazing however is that Adorno et al. identified such ideas as "conservative". They were in fact simply popular ideas of the day but ones that had been most heavily promoted by the Left right up until the then-recent WWII.  See here for details of prewar "Progressive" thinking.
 
  
The basic aim of all bureaucrats  is to maximize their funding and minimize their workload
 
  
A lesson in Australian:  When an Australian calls someone a "big-noter", he is saying that the person is a chronic and rather pathetic seeker of admiration  -- as in someone who often pulls out "big notes" (e.g. $100.00 bills) to pay for things, thus endeavouring to create the impression that he is rich.  The term describes the mentality rather than the actual behavior with money and it aptly describes many Leftists.  When they purport to show "compassion" by advocating things that cost themselves nothing (e.g. advocating more taxes on "the rich" to help "the poor"), an Australian might say that the Leftist is "big-noting himself".  There is an example of the usage here.  The term conveys contempt.  There is a wise description of Australians generally here
 
  
Some ancient wisdom for Leftists:  "Be not righteous overmuch; neither make thyself over wise:  Why shouldest thou die before thy time?" -- Ecclesiastes 7:16
 
  
People who mention differences in black vs. white IQ are these days almost universally howled down and subjected to the most extreme abuse.  I am a psychometrician, however, so I feel obliged to defend the scientific truth of the matter:  The average black adult has about the same IQ as an average white 11-year-old.  The American Psychological Association is generally Left-leaning but it is the world's most prestigious body of academic psychologists.  And even they have had to concede that sort of gap (one SD) in black vs. white average IQ.  11-year olds can do a lot of things but they also have their limits and there are times when such limits need to be allowed for.  
 
  
Jesse Jackson: "There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery -- then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."   There ARE important racial differences.
 
  
Some Jimmy Carter wisdom:  "I think it's inevitable that there will be a lower standard of living than what everybody had always anticipated," he told advisers in 1979. "there's going to be a downward turning."
 
  
 
  
R.I.P. Augusto Pinochet. Pinochet deposed a law-defying Marxist President at the express and desperate invitation of the Chilean parliament. He pioneered the free-market reforms which Reagan and Thatcher later unleashed to world-changing effect. That he used far-Leftist methods to suppress far-Leftist violence is reasonable if not ideal. The Leftist view that they should have a monopoly of violence and that others should follow the law is a total absurdity which shows only that their hate overcomes their reason
 
  
Did William Zantzinger kill poor Hattie Carroll?
 
  
 
  
The "steamroller" above who got steamrollered by his own hubris.  Spitzer is a warning of how self-destructive a vast ego can be  -- and also of how destructive of others it can be.
 
  
Many people hunger and thirst after righteousness.  Some find it in the hatreds of the Left.  Others find it in the love of Christ.  I don't hunger and thirst after righteousness at all.  I hunger and thirst after truth.  How old-fashioned can you get?
 
  
Heritage is what survives death:  Very rare and hence very valuable
 
  
I completed the work for my Ph.D. at the end of 1970 but the degree was not awarded until 1974 -- due to some academic nastiness from Seymour Martin Lipset and Fred Emery.  A conservative or libertarian who makes it through the academic maze has to be at least twice as good as the average conformist Leftist.  Fortunately, I am a born academic.
 
  
As well as being an academic, I am an army man and I am pleased and proud to say that I have worn my country's uniform.  Although my service in the Australian army was chiefly noted for its un-notability,  I DID join voluntarily in the Vietnam era, I DID reach the rank of Sergeant, and I DID volunteer for a posting in Vietnam.  So I think I may be forgiven for saying something that most army men think but which most don't say because they think it is too obvious:  The profession of arms is the noblest profession of all because it is the only profession where you offer to lay down your life in performing your duties.  Our men fought so that people could say and think what they like but I myself always treat military men with  great respect  -- respect which in my view is simply their due.
 
  
Two lines below of a famous hymn that would be incomprehensible to Leftists today ("honor"?  "right"?  "freedom?"  Freedom to agree with them is the only freedom they believe in)
  
First to fight for right and freedom, 
And to keep our honor clean
  
It is of course the hymn of the USMC -- still today  the relentless warriors that they always were.
 
  
I imagine that few of my readers will understand it, but I am an unabashed monarchist.  And, as someone who was born and bred in a monarchy and who still lives there (i.e. Australia), that gives me no conflicts at all.  In theory, one's respect for the monarchy does not depend on who wears the crown but the impeccable behaviour of the present Queen does of course help perpetuate that respect.  Aside from my huge respect for the Queen, however, my favourite member of the Royal family is the redheaded Prince Harry.  The Royal family is of course a military family and Prince Harry is a great example of that.  As one of the world's most privileged people, he could well be an idle layabout but instead he loves his life in the army.  When his girlfriend Chelsy ditched him because he was so often away, Prince Harry said:  "I love Chelsy but the army comes first".  A perfect military man!  I doubt that many women would understand or approve of his attitude but perhaps my own small army background powers my approval of that attitude.  
 
  
The kneejerk response of the Green/Left to people who challenge them is to say that the challenger is in the pay of "Big Oil", "Big Business", "Big Pharma", "Exxon-Mobil", "The Pioneer Fund" or some other entity that they see, in their childish way,  as a boogeyman.  So I think it might be useful for me to point out that I have NEVER received one cent from anybody by way of support for what I write.  As a retired person, I live entirely on my own investments.  I do not work for anybody and I am not beholden to anybody.  And I have NO investments in oil companies, mining companies or "Big Pharma"
  
UPDATE:  Despite my (statistical) aversion to mining stocks, I have recently bought a few shares in BHP -- the world's biggest miner, I gather.  I run the grave risk of becoming a speaker of famous last words for saying this but I suspect that BHP is now so big as to be largely immune from the risks that plague most mining companies.  I also know of no issue affecting BHP where my writings would have any relevance.  The Left seem to have a visceral hatred of miners.  I have never quite figured out why.
 
  
Despite my great sympathy and respect for Christianity,  I am the most complete atheist you could find.  I don't even believe that the word "God"  is meaningful.  I am not at all original in that view, of course.  Such views are particularly associated with the noted German  philosopher Rudolf Carnap.  Unlike Carnap, however, none of my  wives have committed suicide
 
  
 I have no hesitation in saying that the single book which has influenced me most is the New Testament.  And my Scripture blog will show that I know whereof I speak.  Some might conclude that I must therefore  be a very confused sort of atheist but I can assure everyone that I do not feel the least bit confused.  The New Testament is a lighthouse that has illumined the thinking of all sorts of men and women and I am deeply grateful that it has shone on me.
 
  
I am rather pleased to report that I am a lifelong conservative.  Out of intellectual curiosity, I did in my youth join organizations from right across the political spectrum so I am certainly not closed-minded and am very familiar with the full spectrum of political thinking.  Nonetheless, I did not have to undergo the lurch from Left to Right that so many people undergo.  At age 13 I used my pocket-money to subscribe to the "Reader's Digest"  -- the main conservative organ  available in small town Australia of the 1950s.  I have learnt much since but am pleased and amused to note that history has since confirmed most of what I thought at that early age.  Conservatism is in touch with reality.  Leftism is not.  
   
I imagine that the RD are still sending mailouts to my 1950s address
    
Most teenagers have sporting and movie posters on their bedroom walls.  At age 14  I had a map of Taiwan on my wall.
 
  
"Remind me never to get this guy mad at me" -- Instapundit 
 
  
I have used many sites to post my writings over the years and many have gone bad on me for various reasons.  So if you click on a link here to my other writings  you may get a "page not found" response if the link was put up some time before the present.  All is not lost, however.  All my writings have been reposted elsewhere.  If you do strike a failed link, just take the filename (the last part of the link) and add it to the address of any of my current home pages and -- Voila!  -- you should find the article concerned.
 
  
It seems to be a common view that you cannot talk informatively  about a country unless you have been there.  I completely reject that view but it is nonetheless likely that some Leftist dimbulb will at some stage aver that any comments I make about politics and events in the USA should not be heeded because I am an Australian who has lived almost all his life in Australia.  I am reluctant to pander to such ignorance in the era of the "global village" but for the sake of the argument I might mention that I have visited the USA 3 times  -- spending enough time in Los Angeles and NYC to get to know a fair bit about those places at least.  I did however get outside those places enough to realize that they are NOT America.
 
  
If any of the  short observations above about Leftism seem wrong, note that they do not stand alone.  The evidence for them is set out at great length in my MONOGRAPH on Leftism. 
    
COMMENTS:  I have gradually added comments facilities to all my blogs.  The comments I get are interesting.  They are mostly from Leftists and most consist either of abuse or mere assertions.  Reasoned arguments backed up by references to supporting evidence are almost unheard of from Leftists.  Needless to say, I just delete such useless comments.  
 
  
My academic background
   
My full name is Dr. John Joseph RAY.   I am a  former university teacher aged 65 at the time of writing in 2009.  I was born of Australian pioneer stock in 1943 at Innisfail in the State of Queensland in Australia.   I trace my ancestry wholly to the British Isles. After an early education at Innisfail State Rural School and Cairns State High School, I taught myself for matriculation. I took my B.A. in Psychology from the University of Queensland in Brisbane. I then moved to Sydney (in New South Wales, Australia) and took my M.A. in psychology from the University of Sydney in 1969 and my Ph.D. from the School of  Behavioural Sciences at Macquarie University in 1974.  I first tutored in psychology at Macquarie University and then taught sociology at the University of NSW.   My doctorate is in psychology but I taught mainly sociology in my 14 years as a university teacher.  In High Schools I taught economics.  I have taught in both traditional and "progressive" (low discipline) High Schools.  Fuller biographical notes here
   
MY OTHER SITES
 
  
DISSECTING LEFTISM
  
GREENIE WATCH
  
TONGUE TIED
  
AUSTRALIAN POLITICS
  
GUN WATCH
  
PC WATCH
  
EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL
  
FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC
  
EYE ON BRITAIN
  
SOME MEMOIRS
  
LEFTIST ELITISM
  
SOCIALIZED MEDICINE
  
IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL 
  
RECIPES
  
OF INTEREST
  
Of Interest 3
  
There are also two blogspot blogs which record what I think are my main recent articles here and here
  
Mirror for "Dissecting Leftism" 
China Mirror for  "Dissecting Leftism" 
Alt archives 
Longer Academic Papers  
Johnray links 
Academic home page 
Academic Backup Page 
General Backup 
General Backup 2 
 
  
Selected reading
  
MONOGRAPH ON LEFTISM
  
CONSERVATISM AS HERESY
  
Rightism defined 
Leftist Churches 
Leftist Racism 
Fascism is Leftist 
 Hitler a socialist 
What are Leftists 
Psychology of Left 
Status Quo? 
Leftism is authoritarian 
James on Leftism 
Irbe on Leftism 
Beltt on Leftism
  
Critiques 
Lakoff 
 Van Hiel 
Sidanius 
Kruglanski 
Pyszczynski et al. 
 
  
Cautionary blogs about big Australian companies:
   
TELSTRA OPTUS VODAFONE AGL St. George bank Bank of Qld. 
 
  
INTERESTING BLOGS 
(My frequent reads are starred)
  
10 o'clock scholar 
11 Day Empire 
50th Star 
Aaron rants 
Abercrombie Chick 
About Politics 
Acidman 
Across Atlantic 
Agitator* 
Albion's Seedling* 
Also Canadian 
Always Right  
AMCGLTD 
American Indian Movement  
American Mind 
American Outlook 
American Thinker 
American Realpolitik 
Anal Philosopher* 
Anthropology & Econ 
ASTUTE BLOGGERS 
Baby Troll 
Bad Eagle  
Bearpit 
Beautiful Atrocities 
Belmont Club* 
Betsy's Page  
Between Coasts 
Bidinotto 
Bill Keezer 
Bill Quick 
Bits blog 
Bittersweet 
Blackfive 
Bleeding Brain 
Blissful Knowledge 
Blogarama 
BLOGGER NEWS 
Blogs against Hillary 
Blogwise 
Blood & Guts 
Blowhards 
Bob McCarty 
Booker Rising 
Brian Leiter scrutinized 
Brothers Judd* 
Bureaucrash 
Camp Katrina 
Campus Newspaper Confab 
Canadian Comment 
Candle in dark 
Catallarchy* 
Chez Joel 
Chomsky demolished 
Civilian Gun Self defense 
Classical Values 
Clayton Cramer* 
Climate audit 
Climate science 
Colby Cosh 
Cold Fury 
The Commons 
Common-sense & Wonder* 
Conjecturer 
Conservative Eyes 
Conservative Grapevine 
Conservative Philosopher 
Conservative Pleasure 
Conservative Voice 
Conservatives Anonymous 
Country Store 
Critical Mass 
Cronaca* 
Culture Battles 
Curmudgeon  
Daly Thoughts 
Damian Penny 
Dancing Dogs 
Danegerus 
Declarer 
Dean's World  
Deinonychus antirrhopus  
Democratism  
Dhimmi Watch 
Dick List 
Dick McDonald* 
Discover the networks 
Discriminations 
Dodge Blog  
Drink This 
Dr Helen 
Dr Sanity 
Drunkablog 
Ed Driscoll 
Eddy Rants 
Electric Venom 
Elephants in Academia 
Endiana 
Enter Stage Right 
Envirospin 
Eugene Undergound 
Evangelical Ecologist 
Everything I Know 
Fighting in the Shade 
Fourth Rail 
Free Patriot 
Free Rain  
Free Speech 
Frizzen Sparks 
Galvin Opinion 
Gates of Vienna 
Gay and Right 
Gay Patriot 
Gene Expression* 
Ghost of Flea 
Global warming & Climate 
GM's Corner 
One Good Turn   
Gold Dog 
GOP & The City 
GOPUSA Alaska 
Grooveswitch 
Grumpy Old Sod 
Gust of Hot Air 
Hall of Record 
Happy Carpenter 
Hatemongers Quart. 
Heretical Ideas 
R. Hide MP 
Hitler's Leftism 
Hoosier Review 
Horsefeathers 
Hugh Hewitt 
Hummers & Cigarettes 
Illumination Inc 
IMAO 
Icecap 
Inductivist 
Infinitely Prolonged 
Instapundit 
Intellectual Conservative 
Interested Participant 
Jackson's Junction 
Jim Kalb 
Junk Food science 
Junk Science 
Just One Minute 
Keeping it Simple 
Kim Du Toit  
Knowledge is Power 
Kommentariat 
Ladybird Deed 
La Shawn  
Laudator 
Let it bleed  
Liberal Wrong 
Liberty Cadre 
Little Green footballs 
Logical Meme 
Lost Tooth Soc 
Lone Wacko 
Lubos Motl 
Luskin 
R. Mandel 
Mangan 
Market Center 
Mark Nicodemo 
Maverick Philosopher 
Medicine World 
MedPundit 
Miami Review 
Michelle Malkin 
Midwest by DC 
Misanthropyst 
Moderate Voice 
Moorewatch 
More Sense than Money 
Moved Truth 
Mr Minority 
Mrs Blessed 
Museum of Left Lunacy 
My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 
National Center 
National Security 
Neo Con Blogger 
Neo Neo-Con 
Never Yet Melted 
New Media Journal 
News Buckit 
New Sisyphus 
New Victorian 
New Zeal Pundit 
No Credentials 
Norm Quantum Weatherby 
Northeastern Intelligence Network 
Not PC 
OC Register blog 
On the Right Side 
Orator 
Overlawyered 
Pakman 
Pajama Editors 
Panic Watch 
Parable Man 
ParaPundit* 
PC Stupidity 
Pedestrian Infidel 
Pejmanesque 
Petrified Truth 
Poli Pundit 
Political Psychology 
Political Theory Review 
Pragmatic Libertarian 
Prof Bainbridge 
Promethean 
Proportional Belief 
 Publius Pundit  
Qando 
Random Observations 
Rand Simberg 
Random Jottings 
Ravenwood 
Raving Atheist 
Reagan Baby 
Red State 
Redwood Dragon 
Regions of Mind 
Rhodey 
Rhymes with Right 
Right Faith 
Right Nation 
Right Reason 
Right Spin 
Rightwing Troll 
Right Thinking 
Right Wing news 
Roadkill 
Ron Hebron 
Rottweiler 
Sayet Right 
Schansberg 
SCSU Scholars* 
Sean Lafreniere 
Seitelplasm 
Sharp Blades 
Sharp Knife 
Should Know 
Silflay Hraka 
Silent Running 
Sine Qua Non 
Smallest Minority 
Spartac.us 
Spelled Sideways 
Squander 2 
Stephen Frank 
Steve Sailer 
Stop and Think 
Stop the ACLU 
Stuart Buck 
Talk Climate Change 
Talking Head 
Tim Worstall 
Townhall C-log 
Truth Laid Bear 
Two-Four Net 
Unca Dave 
Urban Conservative 
Vdare blog 
Verbum Ipsum 
Viking Pundit 
Vodka Pundit 
Voices in Head 
Watt's up with that 
Western Standard 
Bill Whittle 
What If 
Whym Rhymer 
WICKED THOUGHTS* 
Winds of Change 
Wizbang 
World of Reason 
Write Wing Warrior 
You Big Mouth  
Zero Intelligence 
 
  
Education Blogs
  
Early Childhood Education 
Education Wonks 
EducatioNation 
Eduwonk 
Homeschool Blogger 
Joanne Jacobs* 
Marc Miyake* 
No 2 Pencil 
Weary Teacher 
 
  
Economics Blogs
  
Adam Smith 
Arnold Kling 
Chicago Boyz 
Cafe Hayek 
Econopundit 
Environmental Economics 
Environmental Economics & Sust. Devel. 
Innocents Abroad 
Jane Galt 
S. Karlson 
D. Luskin 
Marginal Revolution 
Mises Inst. 
Robert Musil 
Truck & Barter 
  
Australian Blogs  
  
Aussie Political Report 
Tim Blair 
A E Brain 
Brookes news 
The Bunyip 
Catallaxy 
Chrenkoff 
Currency lad 
Daily Constitutional 
Emotional Rex 
Evil Pundit 
Fortress Australia 
Kev Gillett 
Hissink File 
L. Hissink's Crazy World 
ICJS* 
Little Tin Soldier 
M4 Monologues 
M Jennings 
Mangled Thoughts 
Media Dragon 
Oz Conservative 
Pommygranate 
Rational Thoughts 
Slattery 
Tao of Defiance 
Troppo 
Voice of Pacific 
Wog Blog 
WESTERN HEART* 
The Yobbo
 Bastards Inc
 Paul & Carl
 It's A Matter of Opinion
 Cyclone's Sketchblog
 Niner Charlie
 Greyice
 The Dog Blog
 Welcome to the Asylum
 Grinder-Com
 Chris Berg 
 
  
England
  
Anglo Austrian 
Blimpish 
Blithering Bunny 
BNP and Me 
Briffa 
Britain & America 
British Interest 
Burning our Money 
Campaign Against Political Correctness 
Campaign for English Parliament 
Conservative Comment 
Cynical Libertarian 
Daily Ablution 
England Project 
EU Serf 
Norm Geras 
House of Dumb 
IQ & PC 
Liberty Cadre 
Limbic Nutrition 
Majority Rights* 
Melanie Phillips 
NHS Doctor 
Oliver Kamm 
Policeman 
Mike Power 
Right to be Free 
Samizdata 
Sean Gabb 
Natalie Solent 
Sterling Times 
Walking the Streets 
Wayne Smallman 
Rich Webster 
Englishman's Castle 
 
  
Scotland
  
Freedom &  Whisky 
Highland Warrior 
A Place to Stand 
 
  
Wales
  
Brit Nats in Wales 
 
  
Ireland
  
Conservative Dubliner 
Tangled Web 
Hot Air Forum 
 
  
Iceland
  
Ice & Fire 
Great Auk 
 
  
ISRAEL
  
Israel Pundit 
IsraPundit 
Not A Fish 
Steven Plaut 
Rishon 
Think Israel 
 
  
 The Portuguese connection
  
A Razao das Coisas 
 Avaliando o mundo  
Blasfemias 
Blogoesfera Internacional  
Boticario de Provincia 
De Direita 
Direita 
Impertinencias 
Jaquinzinhos 
Nadando contra a mare 
Nortadas 
O Intermitente 
O Reacionario 
O Blog do Alex 
Portugal Liberal 
Super Flumina 
Ser Portugues 
Tempestade Cerebral 
Valete Fratres 
 
  
Other Europe
 
  
Daily Bork 
Davids Medienkritik 
European Family Health 
HispaLibertas 
No Pasaran 
Le Guerre Civili 
Tommy Funebo 
 
  
AFRICA
  
Almost Supernatural 
Ethiopian Pundit 
 
  
BIGGIES 
Ananova 
Beeb 
Best of Web 
Business Review Weekly 
Business Week 
Centcom (Iraq) 
Courier Mail 
Dilby News 
Dinkum Oz 
Economist 
Free Republic 
Forbes 
Front Page 
Human events 
International Business Times 
National Review 
Newsback 
Slate 
Sydney Morning Harold 
Telegraph (London) 
Thunderer (London) 
 
  
Archives:
  
      
  12/30/2001 - 01/06/2002
  08/11/2002 - 08/18/2002
  01/26/2003 - 02/02/2003
  03/02/2003 - 03/09/2003
  03/09/2003 - 03/16/2003
  03/23/2003 - 03/30/2003
  04/06/2003 - 04/13/2003
  04/13/2003 - 04/20/2003
  05/04/2003 - 05/11/2003
  05/11/2003 - 05/18/2003
  05/18/2003 - 05/25/2003
  05/25/2003 - 06/01/2003
  06/01/2003 - 06/08/2003
  06/08/2003 - 06/15/2003
  06/15/2003 - 06/22/2003
  06/22/2003 - 06/29/2003
  06/29/2003 - 07/06/2003
  07/06/2003 - 07/13/2003
  07/20/2003 - 07/27/2003
  07/27/2003 - 08/03/2003
  08/03/2003 - 08/10/2003
  08/10/2003 - 08/17/2003
  08/17/2003 - 08/24/2003
  08/24/2003 - 08/31/2003
  08/31/2003 - 09/07/2003
  09/07/2003 - 09/14/2003
  09/14/2003 - 09/21/2003
  09/21/2003 - 09/28/2003
  09/28/2003 - 10/05/2003
  10/19/2003 - 10/26/2003
  10/26/2003 - 11/02/2003
  11/02/2003 - 11/09/2003
  11/16/2003 - 11/23/2003
  11/23/2003 - 11/30/2003
  12/21/2003 - 12/28/2003
  12/28/2003 - 01/04/2004
  01/04/2004 - 01/11/2004
  01/11/2004 - 01/18/2004
  01/18/2004 - 01/25/2004
  01/25/2004 - 02/01/2004
  02/01/2004 - 02/08/2004
  02/08/2004 - 02/15/2004
  02/15/2004 - 02/22/2004
  02/22/2004 - 02/29/2004
  03/07/2004 - 03/14/2004
  03/14/2004 - 03/21/2004
  03/21/2004 - 03/28/2004
  03/28/2004 - 04/04/2004
  04/04/2004 - 04/11/2004
  04/25/2004 - 05/02/2004
  05/02/2004 - 05/09/2004
  05/09/2004 - 05/16/2004
  05/16/2004 - 05/23/2004
  05/23/2004 - 05/30/2004
  05/30/2004 - 06/06/2004
  06/06/2004 - 06/13/2004
  06/13/2004 - 06/20/2004
  06/20/2004 - 06/27/2004
  06/27/2004 - 07/04/2004
  07/04/2004 - 07/11/2004
  08/29/2004 - 09/05/2004
  09/05/2004 - 09/12/2004
  09/19/2004 - 09/26/2004
  09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004
  10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004
  10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004
  10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004
  10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004
  11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004
  11/21/2004 - 11/28/2004
  12/12/2004 - 12/19/2004
  12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005
  01/09/2005 - 01/16/2005
  01/23/2005 - 01/30/2005
  03/06/2005 - 03/13/2005
  04/10/2005 - 04/17/2005
  04/24/2005 - 05/01/2005
  05/01/2005 - 05/08/2005
  06/19/2005 - 06/26/2005
  07/10/2005 - 07/17/2005
  07/24/2005 - 07/31/2005
  07/31/2005 - 08/07/2005
  09/18/2005 - 09/25/2005
  09/25/2005 - 10/02/2005
  10/16/2005 - 10/23/2005
  12/25/2005 - 01/01/2006
  01/01/2006 - 01/08/2006
  01/22/2006 - 01/29/2006
  04/09/2006 - 04/16/2006
  04/16/2006 - 04/23/2006
  05/07/2006 - 05/14/2006
  05/14/2006 - 05/21/2006
  06/04/2006 - 06/11/2006
  06/18/2006 - 06/25/2006
  07/23/2006 - 07/30/2006
  08/06/2006 - 08/13/2006
  08/13/2006 - 08/20/2006
  09/24/2006 - 10/01/2006
  10/22/2006 - 10/29/2006
  12/24/2006 - 12/31/2006
  02/18/2007 - 02/25/2007
  03/04/2007 - 03/11/2007
  05/13/2007 - 05/20/2007
  07/01/2007 - 07/08/2007
  08/05/2007 - 08/12/2007
  03/30/2008 - 04/06/2008
  12/05/2010 - 12/12/2010
 
  
        
     | 
      | 
    
      
      
      
        
          Sunday, January 04, 2004
        
        
          
        Historic craft 
 
 In "No slander in exposing cultural brutality" (Opinion, 29/12), Keith Windschuttle still cannot accept that he has lost all credibility as a historian of the colonial frontier. 
 
 He repeats his original claim that historians of the Tasmanian Aborigines, like myself, fabricated footnotes. But he wilfully ignores historian Inga Clendinnen's conclusions, in a major review of the history wars in the Australian Financial Review (31/10/03), that the footnote errors were "few, explicable and trivial". 
 
 This verdict not only contradicts Windschuttle's argument that frontier historians have wilfully manipulated and misused evidence, it places his own work under the gun. For example, he originally claimed that at least nine major massacres of Aborigines in Tasmania and other parts of Australia were fabricated or exaggerated. 
 
 But seven historians who conducted independent investigations into these massacres and the way Windschuttle researched them, could find no evidence that they were fabricated or exaggerated. Instead they found that, in every case, Windschuttle had ignored key evidence and coarsely misread the rest to make his specious claims. In two cases they found he had manipulated the evidence to make his case. 
 
 It's about time he acknowledged that he is the real fabricator of the past.
 
 Lyndall Ryan
 Terrigal, NSW
 
 The letter above appeared in “The Australian” on January 3rd, 2003 here but letters seem not to stay online long so I have reproduced it above
  
        posted by JR
        7:33 PM
         
        
        
          
  
        
      
      
        
      
      
  
      
   
       
    
  |