| 
 
 
      
        
      HOME
      ARCHIVES
 
 Emails and articles of interest are posted here by John Ray to make them more widely available
 
 
 
   
 
 "And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed" -- Genesis 12:3
 
 
 My (Gentile) opinion of antisemitism:  The Jews are the best we've got so killing them is killing us.
 
 
 I have always liked the story of Gideon (See Judges chapters 6 to 8) and it is surely no surprise that in the present age Israel is the Gideon of nations:  Few in numbers but big in power and impact.
 
 
 Postings from Brisbane, Australia by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.) -- former member of the Australia-Soviet Friendship Society, former anarcho-capitalist and former member of the British Conservative party.
 
 
 America is no longer the land of the free.  It is now the land of the regulated  -- though it is not alone in that, of course
 
 
 The Leftist motto: "I love humanity. It's just people I can't stand"
 
 
 Why are Leftists always talking about hate?  Because it fills their own hearts
 
 
 Envy is a strong and widespread human emotion so there has alway been widespread support for policies of economic "levelling".  Both the USA and the modern-day State of Israel were founded by communists but reality taught both societies that respect for the individual gave much better outcomes than levelling ideas.  Sadly, there are many people in both societies in whom hatred for others is so strong that they are incapable of respect for the individual. The destructiveness of what they support causes them to call themselves many names in different times and places but they are the backbone of the political Left
 
 
 The large number of rich Leftists suggests  that, for them,  envy is secondary.  They are directly driven by hatred and scorn for many of the other people that they see about them.  Hatred of others can be rooted in many things, not only in envy.  But the haters come together as the Left.
 
 
 Leftists hate the world around them and want to change it: the people in it most particularly. Conservatives just want to be left alone to make their own decisions and follow their own values.
 
 
 Ronald Reagan famously observed that the status quo is Latin for “the mess we’re in.”  So much for the vacant Leftist claim that conservatives are simply defenders of the status quo.  They think that conservatives are as lacking in  principles as they are.
 
 
 The shallow thinkers of the Left sometimes claim that conservatives want to impose their own will on others in the matter of abortion.  To make that claim is however to confuse religion with politics. Conservatives are in fact divided about their response to abortion.   The REAL opposition to abortion is religious rather than political.  And the church which has historically tended to support the LEFT -- the Roman Catholic church  -- is the most fervent in the anti-abortion cause.   Conservatives   are indeed the one side of politics to have moral qualms on the issue but they tend to seek a middle road in dealing with it.  Taking the issue to the point of legal prohibitions is a religious doctrine rather than a conservative one  -- and the religion concerned  may or may not  be characteristically conservative.  More on that here
 
 
 Some Leftist hatred arises from the fact that they  blame "society" for their own personal problems and inadequacies
 
 
 The Leftist hunger for change to the society that they hate leads to a  hunger for control over other people.  And they will do and say anything to get that control: "Power at any price". Leftist politicians are mostly self-aggrandizing crooks who gain power by deceiving the uninformed with snake-oil promises   -- power which they invariably use to destroy.  Destruction is all that they are good at.  Destruction is what haters do.
 
 
 Leftists are consistent only in their hate.  They don't have principles.  How can they when "there is no such thing as right and wrong"?  All they have is postures, pretend-principles that can be changed as easily as one changes one's shirt
 
 
 I often wonder why Leftists refer to conservatives as "wingnuts".  A wingnut is a very useful device that adds versatility wherever it is used.  Clearly, Leftists are not even good at abuse.  Once they have accused their opponents of racism and Nazism, their cupboard is bare.  Similarly, Leftists seem to think it is a devastating critique to refer to "Worldnet Daily" as "Worldnut Daily".  The poverty of their argumentation is truly pitiful
 
 
 The Leftist assertion that there is no such thing as right and wrong has a distinguished history.  It was Pontius Pilate who said "What is truth?" (John 18:38).  From a Christian viewpoint, the assertion is undoubtedly the Devil's gospel
 
 
 "If one rejects laissez faire on account of man's fallibility and moral weakness, one must for the same reason also reject every kind of government action." - Ludwig von Mises
 
 
 The naive scholar who searches for a consistent Leftist program will not find it. What there is consists only in the negation of the present.
 
 
 Because of their need to be different from the mainstream, Leftists are very good at pretending that sow's ears are silk purses
 
 
 Among well-informed people, Leftism is a character defect.  Leftists hate success in others -- which is why notably successful societies such as the USA and Israel are hated and failures such as the Palestinians can do no wrong.
 
 
 A Leftist's beliefs are all designed to pander to his ego.  So when you have an argument with a Leftist, you are not really  discussing the facts.  You are threatening his self esteem.  Which is why the normal Leftist response to challenge is mere abuse.
 
 
 Because of the fragility of a Leftist's ego, anything that threatens it is intolerable and provokes rage.  So most Leftist blogs can be summarized in one sentence:  "How DARE anybody question what I believe!".  Rage and abuse substitute for an appeal to facts and reason.
 
 
 Their threatened egos sometimes drive Leftists into quite desperate flights from reality.  For instance, they often call Israel an "Apartheid state"  -- when it is in fact the Arab states that practice Apartheid  -- witness the severe restrictions on Christians in Saudi Arabia.  There are no such restrictions  in Israel.
 
 
 Because their beliefs serve their ego rather than reality, Leftists just KNOW what is good for us.  Conservatives need evidence.
 
 
 “Absolute certainty is the privilege of uneducated men and fanatics.”  -- C.J. Keyser
 
 
 "Almost all professors of the arts and sciences are egregiously conceited, and derive their happiness from their conceit"  -- Erasmus
 
 
 THE FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY HAS DONE MORE TO IMPEDE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT THAN ANY ONE THING KNOWN TO MANKIND -- ROUSSEAU
 
 
 "Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him" (Proverbs 26: 12).  I think that sums up Leftists pretty well.
 
 
 Eminent British astrophysicist Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington is often quoted as saying: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine."  It was probably in fact said by his contemporary, J.B.S. Haldane.  But regardless of authorship, it could well be a conservative credo not only about the cosmos but also about human beings and human society.  Mankind is  too complex to  be summed  up by simple rules and even complex rules are only approximations with many exceptions.
 
 
 Politics is the only thing Leftists know about.  They know nothing of economics, history or business.  Their only expertise is in promoting feelings of grievance
 
 
 Socialism makes the individual the slave of the state – capitalism frees them.
 
 
 MESSAGE to Leftists:  Even if you killed all conservatives tomorrow, you would just end up in another Soviet Union.  Conservatives are all that stand between you and that dismal fate.
 
 
 Many readers here will have noticed that what I say about Leftists sometimes sounds reminiscent of  what Leftists say about conservatives.  There is an excellent reason for that.  Leftists are great "projectors" (people who see their own faults in others).  So a good first step in finding out what is true of Leftists is to look at what they say about conservatives!  They even accuse conservatives of projection (of course).
 
 
 The research shows clearly that one's Left/Right stance is strongly genetically inherited but nobody knows just what specifically is inherited.    What is inherited that makes people Leftist or Rightist?  There is any amount of evidence that personality traits are strongly genetically inherited so my proposal is that hard-core Leftists are people who tend to let their emotions (including hatred and envy) run away with them and who are much more in need of seeing themselves as better than others  -- two attributes that are probably related to one another.  Such Leftists may be an evolutionary leftover from a more primitive past.
 
 
 Leftists seem to believe that if someone like Al Gore says it, it must be right.  They obviously have a strong need for an authority figure. The fact that the two most authoritarian regimes of the 20th century (Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia) were socialist is thus no surprise.  Leftists often accuse conservatives of being "authoritarian" but that is just part of their usual "projective" strategy  -- seeing in others what is really true of themselves.
 
 
 Following the Sotomayor precedent, I would hope that a wise older white man such as myself  with the richness of that  experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than someone who hasn’t lived that life.
 
 
 IQ and ideology:  Most academics are Left-leaning.  Why?  Because very bright people who have balls go into business, while very bright people with no balls go into academe.  I did both with considerable success, which makes me a considerable rarity.  Although I am a born academic, I have always been good with money too.  My share portfolio even survived the GFC in good shape.  The academics hate it that bright people with balls make more money than them.
 
 
 If I were not an atheist, I would believe that God had a sense of humour.  He gave his chosen people (the Jews) enormous advantages  -- high intelligence and high drive  -- but to keep it fair he deprived them of something hugely important too:  Political sense.  So Jews to this day tend very strongly to be Leftist  -- even though the chief source of antisemitism for roughly the last 200 years has been the political Left!
 
 
 And the other side of the coin is that Jews tend to despise conservatives and Christians.  Yet American fundamentalist Christians are the bedrock of the vital American support for Israel, the ultimate bolthole for all Jews.  So Jewish political irrationality   seems to be a rather good example of the saying that "The LORD giveth and the LORD taketh away".   There are many other examples of such  perversity (or "balance").  The sometimes severe side-effects of most pharmaceutical drugs is an obvious one but there is another ethnic example too,  a rather  amusing one.  Chinese people are in general smart and patient people but their rate of traffic accidents in China is about 10 times higher than what prevails in Western societies.  They are brilliant mathematicians and fearless business entrepreneurs but at the same time bad drivers!
 
 The above is good testimony to the accuracy  of the basic conservative insight  that almost anything in human life is too complex to be reduced to any simple rule and too complex to be reduced to any rule at all without allowance for important exceptions to the rule concerned
 
 
 "Why should the German be interested in the liberation of the Jew, if the Jew is not interested in the liberation of the German?...   We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time...  In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism....  Indeed, in North America, the practical domination of Judaism over the Christian world has achieved as its unambiguous and normal expression that the preaching of the Gospel itself and the Christian ministry have become articles of trade...  Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist".  Who said that?  Hitler?  No.  It was Karl Marx.  See also here and here and here.  For roughly two centuries now, antisemitism has, throughout the Western world, been principally associated with Leftism (including the socialist Hitler)  -- as it is to this day.  See here.
 
 
 Leftists call their hatred of Israel "Anti-Zionism" but Zionists are only a small minority in Israel
 
 
 Some of the Leftist hatred of Israel is motivated by old-fashioned antisemitism (beliefs in Jewish "control" etc.) but most of it is just the regular  Leftist hatred of success in others.  And because  the societies they inhabit do not give them the vast amount of recognition that  their large but weak egos need, some of the most virulent haters of Israel and America live in those countries.  So the hatred is the product of pathologically high self-esteem.
 
 
 Conservatives, on the other hand could be antisemitic on entirely rational grounds:  Namely, the overwhelming Leftism of the Jewish population as a whole.  Because they judge the individual, however, only a tiny minority of conservative-oriented people make such general judgments.  The longer Jews continue on their "stiff-necked" course, however, the more that is in danger of changing.  The children of Israel have been a stiff necked people since the days of Moses, however,  so they will no doubt continue to vote with their emotions rather than their reason.
 
 
 Who said this  in 1968? "I am not, and never have been, a man of the right. My position was on the Left and is now in the centre of politics".  It was Sir Oswald Mosley, founder and leader of the British Union of Fascists
 
 
 The term "Fascism" is mostly used by the Left as a brainless term of abuse.  But when they do make a serious attempt to define it, they produce very complex and elaborate definitions  -- e.g.  here and here.  In fact, Fascism is simply extreme socialism plus nationalism.  But great gyrations are needed to avoid mentioning the first part of that recipe, of course.
 
 
 Politicians are in general only a little above average  in intelligence so the  idea that they can  make better decisions for us that we can make ourselves is laughable
 
 
 A quote from the late Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931–2005:  "You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.  When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."
 
 
 The Supreme Court of the United States is now and always has been a judicial abomination.  Its guiding  principles have always been political rather than judicial.  It is not as political as Stalin's courts but its respect for the constitution is little better.   Some recent abuses:   The "equal treatment" provision of the 14th amendment was specifically written to outlaw racial discrimination yet the court has allowed various forms of "affirmative action" for decades  -- when all such policies should have been completely stuck down immediately.  The 2nd. amendment says that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed yet gun control laws infringe it in every State in the union.  The 1st amendment provides that speech shall be freely exercised yet the court has upheld various restrictions on the financing and display of political advertising.  The court has found a right to abortion in the constitution when the word abortion is not even mentioned there.  The court invents rights that do not exist and denies rights that do.
 
 
 "Some action that is unconstitutional has much to recommend it"  -- Elena Kagan, nominated to SCOTUS by Obama
 
 
 The U.S. Constitution is neither "living" nor dead.  It is fixed until it is amended.  But amending it is the privilege of the people, not of politicians or judges
 
 
 The book, The authoritarian personality, authored by T.W. Adorno et al. in 1950, has been massively popular among psychologists.  It claims that a set of ideas that were popular in the "Progressive"-dominated America of the prewar era were "authoritarian".  Leftist regimes always are authoritarian so that claim was not a big problem.  What was quite amazing however is that Adorno et al. identified such ideas as "conservative". They were in fact simply popular ideas of the day but ones that had been most heavily promoted by the Left right up until the then-recent WWII.  See here for details of prewar "Progressive" thinking.
 
 
 The basic aim of all bureaucrats  is to maximize their funding and minimize their workload
 
 
 A lesson in Australian:  When an Australian calls someone a "big-noter", he is saying that the person is a chronic and rather pathetic seeker of admiration  -- as in someone who often pulls out "big notes" (e.g. $100.00 bills) to pay for things, thus endeavouring to create the impression that he is rich.  The term describes the mentality rather than the actual behavior with money and it aptly describes many Leftists.  When they purport to show "compassion" by advocating things that cost themselves nothing (e.g. advocating more taxes on "the rich" to help "the poor"), an Australian might say that the Leftist is "big-noting himself".  There is an example of the usage here.  The term conveys contempt.  There is a wise description of Australians generally here
 
 
 Some ancient wisdom for Leftists:  "Be not righteous overmuch; neither make thyself over wise:  Why shouldest thou die before thy time?" -- Ecclesiastes 7:16
 
 
 People who mention differences in black vs. white IQ are these days almost universally howled down and subjected to the most extreme abuse.  I am a psychometrician, however, so I feel obliged to defend the scientific truth of the matter:  The average black adult has about the same IQ as an average white 11-year-old.  The American Psychological Association is generally Left-leaning but it is the world's most prestigious body of academic psychologists.  And even they have had to concede that sort of gap (one SD) in black vs. white average IQ.  11-year olds can do a lot of things but they also have their limits and there are times when such limits need to be allowed for.
 
 
 Jesse Jackson: "There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery -- then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."   There ARE important racial differences.
 
 
 Some Jimmy Carter wisdom:  "I think it's inevitable that there will be a lower standard of living than what everybody had always anticipated," he told advisers in 1979. "there's going to be a downward turning."
 
 
 
   
 R.I.P. Augusto Pinochet. Pinochet deposed a law-defying Marxist President at the express and desperate invitation of the Chilean parliament. He pioneered the free-market reforms which Reagan and Thatcher later unleashed to world-changing effect. That he used far-Leftist methods to suppress far-Leftist violence is reasonable if not ideal. The Leftist view that they should have a monopoly of violence and that others should follow the law is a total absurdity which shows only that their hate overcomes their reason
 
 
 Did William Zantzinger kill poor Hattie Carroll?
 
 
 
   
 The "steamroller" above who got steamrollered by his own hubris.  Spitzer is a warning of how self-destructive a vast ego can be  -- and also of how destructive of others it can be.
 
 
 Many people hunger and thirst after righteousness.  Some find it in the hatreds of the Left.  Others find it in the love of Christ.  I don't hunger and thirst after righteousness at all.  I hunger and thirst after truth.  How old-fashioned can you get?
 
 
 Heritage is what survives death:  Very rare and hence very valuable
 
 
 I completed the work for my Ph.D. at the end of 1970 but the degree was not awarded until 1974 -- due to some academic nastiness from Seymour Martin Lipset and Fred Emery.  A conservative or libertarian who makes it through the academic maze has to be at least twice as good as the average conformist Leftist.  Fortunately, I am a born academic.
 
 
 As well as being an academic, I am an army man and I am pleased and proud to say that I have worn my country's uniform.  Although my service in the Australian army was chiefly noted for its un-notability,  I DID join voluntarily in the Vietnam era, I DID reach the rank of Sergeant, and I DID volunteer for a posting in Vietnam.  So I think I may be forgiven for saying something that most army men think but which most don't say because they think it is too obvious:  The profession of arms is the noblest profession of all because it is the only profession where you offer to lay down your life in performing your duties.  Our men fought so that people could say and think what they like but I myself always treat military men with  great respect  -- respect which in my view is simply their due.
 
 
 Two lines below of a famous hymn that would be incomprehensible to Leftists today ("honor"?  "right"?  "freedom?"  Freedom to agree with them is the only freedom they believe in)
 
 First to fight for right and freedom,
 And to keep our honor clean
 
 It is of course the hymn of the USMC -- still today  the relentless warriors that they always were.
 
 
 I imagine that few of my readers will understand it, but I am an unabashed monarchist.  And, as someone who was born and bred in a monarchy and who still lives there (i.e. Australia), that gives me no conflicts at all.  In theory, one's respect for the monarchy does not depend on who wears the crown but the impeccable behaviour of the present Queen does of course help perpetuate that respect.  Aside from my huge respect for the Queen, however, my favourite member of the Royal family is the redheaded Prince Harry.  The Royal family is of course a military family and Prince Harry is a great example of that.  As one of the world's most privileged people, he could well be an idle layabout but instead he loves his life in the army.  When his girlfriend Chelsy ditched him because he was so often away, Prince Harry said:  "I love Chelsy but the army comes first".  A perfect military man!  I doubt that many women would understand or approve of his attitude but perhaps my own small army background powers my approval of that attitude.
 
 
 The kneejerk response of the Green/Left to people who challenge them is to say that the challenger is in the pay of "Big Oil", "Big Business", "Big Pharma", "Exxon-Mobil", "The Pioneer Fund" or some other entity that they see, in their childish way,  as a boogeyman.  So I think it might be useful for me to point out that I have NEVER received one cent from anybody by way of support for what I write.  As a retired person, I live entirely on my own investments.  I do not work for anybody and I am not beholden to anybody.  And I have NO investments in oil companies, mining companies or "Big Pharma"
 
 UPDATE:  Despite my (statistical) aversion to mining stocks, I have recently bought a few shares in BHP -- the world's biggest miner, I gather.  I run the grave risk of becoming a speaker of famous last words for saying this but I suspect that BHP is now so big as to be largely immune from the risks that plague most mining companies.  I also know of no issue affecting BHP where my writings would have any relevance.  The Left seem to have a visceral hatred of miners.  I have never quite figured out why.
 
 
 Despite my great sympathy and respect for Christianity,  I am the most complete atheist you could find.  I don't even believe that the word "God"  is meaningful.  I am not at all original in that view, of course.  Such views are particularly associated with the noted German  philosopher Rudolf Carnap.  Unlike Carnap, however, none of my  wives have committed suicide
 
 
 I have no hesitation in saying that the single book which has influenced me most is the New Testament.  And my Scripture blog will show that I know whereof I speak.  Some might conclude that I must therefore  be a very confused sort of atheist but I can assure everyone that I do not feel the least bit confused.  The New Testament is a lighthouse that has illumined the thinking of all sorts of men and women and I am deeply grateful that it has shone on me.
 
 
 I am rather pleased to report that I am a lifelong conservative.  Out of intellectual curiosity, I did in my youth join organizations from right across the political spectrum so I am certainly not closed-minded and am very familiar with the full spectrum of political thinking.  Nonetheless, I did not have to undergo the lurch from Left to Right that so many people undergo.  At age 13 I used my pocket-money to subscribe to the "Reader's Digest"  -- the main conservative organ  available in small town Australia of the 1950s.  I have learnt much since but am pleased and amused to note that history has since confirmed most of what I thought at that early age.  Conservatism is in touch with reality.  Leftism is not.
 
 I imagine that the RD are still sending mailouts to my 1950s address
 
 
 Most teenagers have sporting and movie posters on their bedroom walls.  At age 14  I had a map of Taiwan on my wall.
 
 
 "Remind me never to get this guy mad at me" -- Instapundit
 
 
 I have used many sites to post my writings over the years and many have gone bad on me for various reasons.  So if you click on a link here to my other writings  you may get a "page not found" response if the link was put up some time before the present.  All is not lost, however.  All my writings have been reposted elsewhere.  If you do strike a failed link, just take the filename (the last part of the link) and add it to the address of any of my current home pages and -- Voila!  -- you should find the article concerned.
 
 
 It seems to be a common view that you cannot talk informatively  about a country unless you have been there.  I completely reject that view but it is nonetheless likely that some Leftist dimbulb will at some stage aver that any comments I make about politics and events in the USA should not be heeded because I am an Australian who has lived almost all his life in Australia.  I am reluctant to pander to such ignorance in the era of the "global village" but for the sake of the argument I might mention that I have visited the USA 3 times  -- spending enough time in Los Angeles and NYC to get to know a fair bit about those places at least.  I did however get outside those places enough to realize that they are NOT America.
 
 
 If any of the  short observations above about Leftism seem wrong, note that they do not stand alone.  The evidence for them is set out at great length in my MONOGRAPH on Leftism.
 
 
 COMMENTS:  I have gradually added comments facilities to all my blogs.  The comments I get are interesting.  They are mostly from Leftists and most consist either of abuse or mere assertions.  Reasoned arguments backed up by references to supporting evidence are almost unheard of from Leftists.  Needless to say, I just delete such useless comments.
 
 
 My academic background
 
 My full name is Dr. John Joseph RAY.   I am a  former university teacher aged 65 at the time of writing in 2009.  I was born of Australian pioneer stock in 1943 at Innisfail in the State of Queensland in Australia.   I trace my ancestry wholly to the British Isles. After an early education at Innisfail State Rural School and Cairns State High School, I taught myself for matriculation. I took my B.A. in Psychology from the University of Queensland in Brisbane. I then moved to Sydney (in New South Wales, Australia) and took my M.A. in psychology from the University of Sydney in 1969 and my Ph.D. from the School of  Behavioural Sciences at Macquarie University in 1974.  I first tutored in psychology at Macquarie University and then taught sociology at the University of NSW.   My doctorate is in psychology but I taught mainly sociology in my 14 years as a university teacher.  In High Schools I taught economics.  I have taught in both traditional and "progressive" (low discipline) High Schools.  Fuller biographical notes here
 
 MY OTHER SITES
 
 
 DISSECTING LEFTISM
 
 GREENIE WATCH
 
 TONGUE TIED
 
 AUSTRALIAN POLITICS
 
 GUN WATCH
 
 PC WATCH
 
 EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL
 
 FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC
 
 EYE ON BRITAIN
 
 SOME MEMOIRS
 
 LEFTIST ELITISM
 
 SOCIALIZED MEDICINE
 
 IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL
 
 RECIPES
 
 OF INTEREST
 
 Of Interest 3
 
 There are also two blogspot blogs which record what I think are my main recent articles here and here
 
 Mirror for "Dissecting Leftism"
 China Mirror for  "Dissecting Leftism"
 Alt archives
 Longer Academic Papers
 Johnray links
 Academic home page
 Academic Backup Page
 General Backup
 General Backup 2
 
 
 
 Selected reading
 
 MONOGRAPH ON LEFTISM
 
 CONSERVATISM AS HERESY
 
 Rightism defined
 Leftist Churches
 Leftist Racism
 Fascism is Leftist
 Hitler a socialist
 What are Leftists
 Psychology of Left
 Status Quo?
 Leftism is authoritarian
 James on Leftism
 Irbe on Leftism
 Beltt on Leftism
 
 Critiques
 Lakoff
 Van Hiel
 Sidanius
 Kruglanski
 Pyszczynski et al.
 
 
 
 Cautionary blogs about big Australian companies:
 
 TELSTRA
 OPTUS
 VODAFONE
 AGL
 St. George bank
 Bank of Qld.
 
 
 INTERESTING BLOGS
 (My frequent reads are starred)
 
 10 o'clock scholar
 11 Day Empire
 50th Star
 Aaron rants
 Abercrombie Chick
 About Politics
 Acidman
 Across Atlantic
 Agitator*
 Albion's Seedling*
 Also Canadian
 Always Right
 AMCGLTD
 American Indian Movement
 American Mind
 American Outlook
 American Thinker
 American Realpolitik
 Anal Philosopher*
 Anthropology & Econ
 ASTUTE BLOGGERS
 Baby Troll
 Bad Eagle
 Bearpit
 Beautiful Atrocities
 Belmont Club*
 Betsy's Page
 Between Coasts
 Bidinotto
 Bill Keezer
 Bill Quick
 Bits blog
 Bittersweet
 Blackfive
 Bleeding Brain
 Blissful Knowledge
 Blogarama
 BLOGGER NEWS
 Blogs against Hillary
 Blogwise
 Blood & Guts
 Blowhards
 Bob McCarty
 Booker Rising
 Brian Leiter scrutinized
 Brothers Judd*
 Bureaucrash
 Camp Katrina
 Campus Newspaper Confab
 Canadian Comment
 Candle in dark
 Catallarchy*
 Chez Joel
 Chomsky demolished
 Civilian Gun Self defense
 Classical Values
 Clayton Cramer*
 Climate audit
 Climate science
 Colby Cosh
 Cold Fury
 The Commons
 Common-sense & Wonder*
 Conjecturer
 Conservative Eyes
 Conservative Grapevine
 Conservative Philosopher
 Conservative Pleasure
 Conservative Voice
 Conservatives Anonymous
 Country Store
 Critical Mass
 Cronaca*
 Culture Battles
 Curmudgeon
 Daly Thoughts
 Damian Penny
 Dancing Dogs
 Danegerus
 Declarer
 Dean's World
 Deinonychus antirrhopus
 Democratism
 Dhimmi Watch
 Dick List
 Dick McDonald*
 Discover the networks
 Discriminations
 Dodge Blog
 Drink This
 Dr Helen
 Dr Sanity
 Drunkablog
 Ed Driscoll
 Eddy Rants
 Electric Venom
 Elephants in Academia
 Endiana
 Enter Stage Right
 Envirospin
 Eugene Undergound
 Evangelical Ecologist
 Everything I Know
 Fighting in the Shade
 Fourth Rail
 Free Patriot
 Free Rain
 Free Speech
 Frizzen Sparks
 Galvin Opinion
 Gates of Vienna
 Gay and Right
 Gay Patriot
 Gene Expression*
 Ghost of Flea
 Global warming & Climate
 GM's Corner
 One Good Turn
 Gold Dog
 GOP & The City
 GOPUSA Alaska
 Grooveswitch
 Grumpy Old Sod
 Gust of Hot Air
 Hall of Record
 Happy Carpenter
 Hatemongers Quart.
 Heretical Ideas
 R. Hide MP
 Hitler's Leftism
 Hoosier Review
 Horsefeathers
 Hugh Hewitt
 Hummers & Cigarettes
 Illumination Inc
 IMAO
 Icecap
 Inductivist
 Infinitely Prolonged
 Instapundit
 Intellectual Conservative
 Interested Participant
 Jackson's Junction
 Jim Kalb
 Junk Food science
 Junk Science
 Just One Minute
 Keeping it Simple
 Kim Du Toit
 Knowledge is Power
 Kommentariat
 Ladybird Deed
 La Shawn
 Laudator
 Let it bleed
 Liberal Wrong
 Liberty Cadre
 Little Green footballs
 Logical Meme
 Lost Tooth Soc
 Lone Wacko
 Lubos Motl
 Luskin
 R. Mandel
 Mangan
 Market Center
 Mark Nicodemo
 Maverick Philosopher
 Medicine World
 MedPundit
 Miami Review
 Michelle Malkin
 Midwest by DC
 Misanthropyst
 Moderate Voice
 Moorewatch
 More Sense than Money
 Moved Truth
 Mr Minority
 Mrs Blessed
 Museum of Left Lunacy
 My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
 National Center
 National Security
 Neo Con Blogger
 Neo Neo-Con
 Never Yet Melted
 New Media Journal
 News Buckit
 New Sisyphus
 New Victorian
 New Zeal Pundit
 No Credentials
 Norm Quantum Weatherby
 Northeastern Intelligence Network
 Not PC
 OC Register blog
 On the Right Side
 Orator
 Overlawyered
 Pakman
 Pajama Editors
 Panic Watch
 Parable Man
 ParaPundit*
 PC Stupidity
 Pedestrian Infidel
 Pejmanesque
 Petrified Truth
 Poli Pundit
 Political Psychology
 Political Theory Review
 Pragmatic Libertarian
 Prof Bainbridge
 Promethean
 Proportional Belief
 Publius Pundit
 Qando
 Random Observations
 Rand Simberg
 Random Jottings
 Ravenwood
 Raving Atheist
 Reagan Baby
 Red State
 Redwood Dragon
 Regions of Mind
 Rhodey
 Rhymes with Right
 Right Faith
 Right Nation
 Right Reason
 Right Spin
 Rightwing Troll
 Right Thinking
 Right Wing news
 Roadkill
 Ron Hebron
 Rottweiler
 Sayet Right
 Schansberg
 SCSU Scholars*
 Sean Lafreniere
 Seitelplasm
 Sharp Blades
 Sharp Knife
 Should Know
 Silflay Hraka
 Silent Running
 Sine Qua Non
 Smallest Minority
 Spartac.us
 Spelled Sideways
 Squander 2
 Stephen Frank
 Steve Sailer
 Stop and Think
 Stop the ACLU
 Stuart Buck
 Talk Climate Change
 Talking Head
 Tim Worstall
 Townhall C-log
 Truth Laid Bear
 Two-Four Net
 Unca Dave
 Urban Conservative
 Vdare blog
 Verbum Ipsum
 Viking Pundit
 Vodka Pundit
 Voices in Head
 Watt's up with that
 Western Standard
 Bill Whittle
 What If
 Whym Rhymer
 WICKED THOUGHTS*
 Winds of Change
 Wizbang
 World of Reason
 Write Wing Warrior
 You Big Mouth
 Zero Intelligence
 
 
 
 Education Blogs
 
 Early Childhood Education
 Education Wonks
 EducatioNation
 Eduwonk
 Homeschool Blogger
 Joanne Jacobs*
 Marc Miyake*
 No 2 Pencil
 Weary Teacher
 
 
 
 Economics Blogs
 
 Adam Smith
 Arnold Kling
 Chicago Boyz
 Cafe Hayek
 Econopundit
 Environmental Economics
 Environmental Economics & Sust. Devel.
 Innocents Abroad
 Jane Galt
 S. Karlson
 D. Luskin
 Marginal Revolution
 Mises Inst.
 Robert Musil
 Truck & Barter
 
 
 Australian Blogs
 
 
 Aussie Political Report
 Tim Blair
 A E Brain
 Brookes news
 The Bunyip
 Catallaxy
 Chrenkoff
 Currency lad
 Daily Constitutional
 Emotional Rex
 Evil Pundit
 Fortress Australia
 Kev Gillett
 Hissink File
 L. Hissink's Crazy World
 ICJS*
 Little Tin Soldier
 M4 Monologues
 M Jennings
 Mangled Thoughts
 Media Dragon
 Oz Conservative
 Pommygranate
 Rational Thoughts
 Slattery
 Tao of Defiance
 Troppo
 Voice of Pacific
 Wog Blog
 WESTERN HEART*
 The Yobbo
 Bastards Inc
 Paul & Carl
 It's A Matter of Opinion
 Cyclone's Sketchblog
 Niner Charlie
 Greyice
 The Dog Blog
 Welcome to the Asylum
 Grinder-Com
 Chris Berg
 
 
 
 England
 
 Anglo Austrian
 Blimpish
 Blithering Bunny
 BNP and Me
 Briffa
 Britain & America
 British Interest
 Burning our Money
 Campaign Against Political Correctness
 Campaign for English Parliament
 Conservative Comment
 Cynical Libertarian
 Daily Ablution
 England Project
 EU Serf
 Norm Geras
 House of Dumb
 IQ & PC
 Liberty Cadre
 Limbic Nutrition
 Majority Rights*
 Melanie Phillips
 NHS Doctor
 Oliver Kamm
 Policeman
 Mike Power
 Right to be Free
 Samizdata
 Sean Gabb
 Natalie Solent
 Sterling Times
 Walking the Streets
 Wayne Smallman
 Rich Webster
 Englishman's Castle
 
 
 
 Scotland
 
 Freedom &  Whisky
 Highland Warrior
 A Place to Stand
 
 
 
 Wales
 
 Brit Nats in Wales
 
 
 
 Ireland
 
 Conservative Dubliner
 Tangled Web
 Hot Air Forum
 
 
 
 Iceland
 
 Ice & Fire
 Great Auk
 
 
 
 ISRAEL
 
 Israel Pundit
 IsraPundit
 Not A Fish
 Steven Plaut
 Rishon
 Think Israel
 
 
 
 
 The Portuguese connection
 
 A Razao das Coisas
 Avaliando o mundo
 Blasfemias
 Blogoesfera Internacional
 Boticario de Provincia
 De Direita
 Direita
 Impertinencias
 Jaquinzinhos
 Nadando contra a mare
 Nortadas
 O Intermitente
 O Reacionario
 O Blog do Alex
 Portugal Liberal
 Super Flumina
 Ser Portugues
 Tempestade Cerebral
 Valete Fratres
 
 
 
 Other Europe
 
 
 Daily Bork
 Davids Medienkritik
 European Family Health
 HispaLibertas
 No Pasaran
 Le Guerre Civili
 Tommy Funebo
 
 
 
 AFRICA
 
 Almost Supernatural
 Ethiopian Pundit
 
 
 
 BIGGIES
 Ananova
 Beeb
 Best of Web
 Business Review Weekly
 Business Week
 Centcom (Iraq)
 Courier Mail
 Dilby News
 Dinkum Oz
 Economist
 Free Republic
 Forbes
 Front Page
 Human events
 International Business Times
 National Review
 Newsback
 Slate
 Sydney Morning Harold
 Telegraph (London)
 Thunderer (London)
 
 
 
 Archives:
 
 12/30/2001 - 01/06/2002
  08/11/2002 - 08/18/2002
  01/26/2003 - 02/02/2003
  03/02/2003 - 03/09/2003
  03/09/2003 - 03/16/2003
  03/23/2003 - 03/30/2003
  04/06/2003 - 04/13/2003
  04/13/2003 - 04/20/2003
  05/04/2003 - 05/11/2003
  05/11/2003 - 05/18/2003
  05/18/2003 - 05/25/2003
  05/25/2003 - 06/01/2003
  06/01/2003 - 06/08/2003
  06/08/2003 - 06/15/2003
  06/15/2003 - 06/22/2003
  06/22/2003 - 06/29/2003
  06/29/2003 - 07/06/2003
  07/06/2003 - 07/13/2003
  07/20/2003 - 07/27/2003
  07/27/2003 - 08/03/2003
  08/03/2003 - 08/10/2003
  08/10/2003 - 08/17/2003
  08/17/2003 - 08/24/2003
  08/24/2003 - 08/31/2003
  08/31/2003 - 09/07/2003
  09/07/2003 - 09/14/2003
  09/14/2003 - 09/21/2003
  09/21/2003 - 09/28/2003
  09/28/2003 - 10/05/2003
  10/19/2003 - 10/26/2003
  10/26/2003 - 11/02/2003
  11/02/2003 - 11/09/2003
  11/16/2003 - 11/23/2003
  11/23/2003 - 11/30/2003
  12/21/2003 - 12/28/2003
  12/28/2003 - 01/04/2004
  01/04/2004 - 01/11/2004
  01/11/2004 - 01/18/2004
  01/18/2004 - 01/25/2004
  01/25/2004 - 02/01/2004
  02/01/2004 - 02/08/2004
  02/08/2004 - 02/15/2004
  02/15/2004 - 02/22/2004
  02/22/2004 - 02/29/2004
  03/07/2004 - 03/14/2004
  03/14/2004 - 03/21/2004
  03/21/2004 - 03/28/2004
  03/28/2004 - 04/04/2004
  04/04/2004 - 04/11/2004
  04/25/2004 - 05/02/2004
  05/02/2004 - 05/09/2004
  05/09/2004 - 05/16/2004
  05/16/2004 - 05/23/2004
  05/23/2004 - 05/30/2004
  05/30/2004 - 06/06/2004
  06/06/2004 - 06/13/2004
  06/13/2004 - 06/20/2004
  06/20/2004 - 06/27/2004
  06/27/2004 - 07/04/2004
  07/04/2004 - 07/11/2004
  08/29/2004 - 09/05/2004
  09/05/2004 - 09/12/2004
  09/19/2004 - 09/26/2004
  09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004
  10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004
  10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004
  10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004
  10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004
  11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004
  11/21/2004 - 11/28/2004
  12/12/2004 - 12/19/2004
  12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005
  01/09/2005 - 01/16/2005
  01/23/2005 - 01/30/2005
  03/06/2005 - 03/13/2005
  04/10/2005 - 04/17/2005
  04/24/2005 - 05/01/2005
  05/01/2005 - 05/08/2005
  06/19/2005 - 06/26/2005
  07/10/2005 - 07/17/2005
  07/24/2005 - 07/31/2005
  07/31/2005 - 08/07/2005
  09/18/2005 - 09/25/2005
  09/25/2005 - 10/02/2005
  10/16/2005 - 10/23/2005
  12/25/2005 - 01/01/2006
  01/01/2006 - 01/08/2006
  01/22/2006 - 01/29/2006
  04/09/2006 - 04/16/2006
  04/16/2006 - 04/23/2006
  05/07/2006 - 05/14/2006
  05/14/2006 - 05/21/2006
  06/04/2006 - 06/11/2006
  06/18/2006 - 06/25/2006
  07/23/2006 - 07/30/2006
  08/06/2006 - 08/13/2006
  08/13/2006 - 08/20/2006
  09/24/2006 - 10/01/2006
  10/22/2006 - 10/29/2006
  12/24/2006 - 12/31/2006
  02/18/2007 - 02/25/2007
  03/04/2007 - 03/11/2007
  05/13/2007 - 05/20/2007
  07/01/2007 - 07/08/2007
  08/05/2007 - 08/12/2007
  03/30/2008 - 04/06/2008
  12/05/2010 - 12/12/2010
 
 
 |  | 
      
      
        
          Monday, May 24, 2004
         FALLACI SPEAKS
 
 Below are  some paragraphs from Oriana Fallaci's new book LA FORZA DELLA
 RAGIONE (FORCE OF REASON) -- translated by Pieter Uys:
 
 
 L'espansione dell'Islam non avrebbe infatti raggiunto l'attuale aggressività
 se avesse incontrato un'opinione pubblica, una classe politica, una cultura
 capaci di reagire e di salvaguardare con orgoglio il bene supremo di una
 civiltà: la propria identità e i propri valori.
 
 The Islamic expansion would never have reached its level of aggression if it
 had encountered a public opinion, a political class and a culture that were
 able to react and safeguard with pride the ultimate good of our
 civilization: our proper identity and the right values.
 
 Invece ha incontrato una cultura fiacca, pusillanime, arrendevole. Ha
 incontrato i profeti del relativismo e della società plurietnica, pronti a
 giustificare con indulgenza tutti i costumi «diversi» (anche quando sono
 francamente raccapriccianti, come nei tanti casi che riguardano la
 condizione delle donne).
 
 Instead it encountered a weakened, pusillanimous and flexible culture. It
 encountered the prophets of relativism and of the multicultural society,
 quick to justify with indulgence all those "diverse" customs (even those
 that are reprehensible, as in many cases regarding the situation of women).
 
 Ha incontrato i no global, per i quali tutti i mali del mondo nascono
 dall'avidità degli Stati Uniti d'America. Ha incontrato le mobilitazioni dei
 pacifisti arcobaleno, capaci di condannare la guerra in Iraq ma non i
 crimini di Saddam o di Osama.
 
 It encountered the anti-globalists, for whom all the evil of the world come
 from the "greed" of the USA. It met the mobilization of the rainbow
 pacifists who are able to condemn the war in Iraq but not the crimes of
 Saddam or Osama.
 
 Ha incontrato il facile e astuto sentimentalismo umanitario dei mass media,
 che confeziona storie strappalacrime sui bambini palestinesi, non su quelli
 israeliani.
 
 It encountered the facile and crafty humanistic sentimentality of the mass
 media, that give out tear-jerking stories about Palestinian children while
 ignoring the plight of Israeli children.
 
 
 posted by JR
        7:42 AM
 
        
          
 
 
 
 
 |